Business and technology leaders walking through a modern operations campus
Business Technology Engineering

Run manufacturing with connected systems, reliable data, and fewer manual handoffs.

Bring ERP, cloud infrastructure, data, AI, integrations, automation, and software together around the way your manufacturing business actually works.

Explore Engineering CapabilitiesStart With Launchpad

From the first assessment and architecture decisions through deployment, adoption, and ongoing improvement.

Engineering Toolbox

Use the technology the operating problem actually requires.

Manufacturing solutions rarely stop at one product boundary. Metrotechs determines where records should live, how work must cross systems, what requires new capability, and what should remain unchanged.

The answer may extend Oracle, connect Epicor, add APIs and a portal, establish Power BI reporting, or modernize a core platform when the evidence supports it. The architecture earns its place by solving the operation—not by making the project larger.

Manufacturing Services

Engineering services for the business systems behind manufacturing.

Metrotechs connects ERP, cloud infrastructure, operating data, AI, integrations, workflows, portals, and custom software around the way a manufacturer actually works. Contract Manufacturing Visibility is one specialized service within that broader manufacturing work.

Start with the manufacturing problem: disconnected ERP and partner systems, unreliable reporting, manual workflows, limited production visibility, or a capability your current software cannot support.

Explore all industries
Business Problems

The hardest operating problems usually live between systems, teams, and partners.

We start where work or information breaks down. Then we trace the systems, data, handoffs, and ownership behind it and engineer a practical fix.

Disconnected systems

Poor external-manufacturing visibility

Manual workflows

Fragmented data

Legacy systems

Weak reporting

Operational bottlenecks

AI readiness

How We Work

Understand. Assess. Plan. Engineer. Improve.

At every stage, you should know what is changing, why it matters, how it will be tested, what your team will own, and what happens after go-live.

When to Engage

Start when complexity is slowing the operation down.

Bring Metrotechs the workflow that is slow, the status nobody trusts, the partner handoff that keeps failing, or the capability your current systems cannot support cleanly.

Common signal

Status must be rebuilt by hand

Teams assemble spreadsheets, emails, exports, and phone updates before they can answer a routine operating question.

Common signal

Customers or partners cannot see what they need

External visibility is late, inconsistent, or unsafe because the source systems were never designed for controlled access.

Common signal

Growth is multiplying workarounds

More orders, sites, products, or partners create more manual coordination instead of more operating leverage.

Start in Launchpad

Start with a clear picture of how the operation works.

Launchpad keeps the current state, evidence, priorities, risks, and owners in one place so your team can decide what to change and what to do first.

The constraint and who it affects
The systems, records, and owners involved
What can remain in place
The smallest credible next step
News and Guidance

Make better decisions about ERP, cloud, data, and AI.

Metrotechs News covers the technology changes that matter to manufacturers, with practical context for leaders deciding what to buy, build, connect, or improve.

Read the latest news ->
When Partners Cannot Exchange Operating Records Safely or Consistently: How to Diagnose and Respond
Data
6 min

When Partners Cannot Exchange Operating Records Safely or Consistently: How to Diagnose and Respond

A purchase order is acknowledged in one system, but the production schedule never updates. A quality hold is raised, but the warehouse ships anyway. The partner data exchange problem accumulates quietly across ERP, MES, WMS, QMS, and every connection between them. This article maps why the exchange breaks down, compares four approaches with their tradeoffs, and outlines where to start.

Read ->
When Standard Products Cannot Provide the Capability: How to Evaluate Custom Software Engineering for Manufacturing
ERP & Business Systems
6 min

When Standard Products Cannot Provide the Capability: How to Evaluate Custom Software Engineering for Manufacturing

Manufacturing operations teams eventually reach a point where the ERP, MES, WMS, and QMS cannot coordinate a required capability cleanly, and configuration has been exhausted. Before committing to Custom Software Engineering, four lighter approaches deserve honest evaluation: extending the existing system, targeted integration, reporting or portal patterns, and stabilizing the process before adding any technology. Custom engineering earns its place only when the required capability genuinely cannot be delivered through those alternatives, the process is stable, and data ownership is governed. Taking on custom work means taking on a maintenance commitment, not just a build project.

Read ->
When Manufacturing Coordination Runs on Inboxes and Spreadsheets: Choosing the Right Fix
ERP & Business Systems
5 min

When Manufacturing Coordination Runs on Inboxes and Spreadsheets: Choosing the Right Fix

Manual coordination across ERP, MES, WMS, QMS, and partner systems creates delay, rework, and invisible risk for OEM operations teams. The right response depends on whether the breakdown is a data problem, an ownership problem, a visibility problem, or a routing problem. This piece compares four approaches and the tradeoffs that determine which one fits.

Read ->
When Manufacturing Records Can't Be Trusted: Approaches to Reconciling Fragmented Operating Data
Data
6 min

When Manufacturing Records Can't Be Trusted: Approaches to Reconciling Fragmented Operating Data

In many OEM operations, the ERP, shop floor, and warehouse report each tell a different story. The root condition is that order, production, material, inventory, quality, capacity, and shipment records live in separate systems with no single governing view. This article compares five approaches to closing that gap, including extending existing systems, targeted integration, reporting layers, governance-only changes, and a governed Operational Analytics implementation, along with the constraints and tradeoffs that determine which fits.

Read ->